W3. How useful the WB pages are compared to Wikipedia description? / Juhee Cha

 Q. How useful the WB pages are compared to Wikipedia description?


  WB page is a page that supports social development by listening to the voices of poor people for social development, raising their voices in the development process, and establishing formal and informal They are said to be making efforts to analyze social risks, deepen their understanding of the community, and improve service delivery through community-oriented development methods by partnering with the community in the community and urban environment, including analysis of poverty and social trends. The WB page appears to be directly working on a project to solve social problems.
  Wikipedia has the 'education system' that is the greatest possibility of social development. Anyone can share their expertise for free. In addition, various communities can gather together to create one knowledge together. This information of knowledge goes through the process of being re-shared, redistributed and reproduced. I thought both WB pages and wikipedia were helpful sites for social development, although the two sites have different ways. Therefore, it is hard to say which sites are better.
  Do you think WB pages and wikipedia both contribute to social development? If not, why?

Comments

  1. I think both the WB page and Wikipedia contribute to social development. However, I think the two contribute to social development by focusing on different areas. WB Page believes that if we strive to improve the quality of life for the relatively socially disadvantaged, Wikipedia strives to expand knowledge based on information sharing and so on.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W4. Millennium Development Goals / Lee Se Hyun

What is meant by that? / Lee hayoung

W10. Human_rights / Lee Se Hyun