W10. Human_rights / Lee Se Hyun
Summary
Human rights are the basic right to live as
a person. This is an absolute domain. Applicable regardless of ethnicity,
gender, age, or location and guaranteed by international law. Human rights have
been modified and established over a long period of time. From ancient times to
the post-World War II international human rights treaties, various changes and
considerations continued. Since the 1966 Human Rights Treaty, the concept of
human rights has been established and human rights are guaranteed at the international
level through the UN, an international organization. Also, various efforts are
made to ensure human rights in the community. Human rights organizations are
established in continental units such as Africa, America, Asia, and Europe, to
strive for the self-reliance of the vulnerable classes and countries. Human
beings have studied human rights for a long time. Thus, the theory of human
rights exists, and there are various views on human rights.
Interesting point
There are two perspectives on human rights:
universal and relativistic. The universalist view argues that all human beings
are given equal rights regardless of geographical location, race, gender, age
or culture. On the contrary, the relativist view argues that human rights are
not universal and threaten survival in conflict with some cultures. A typical
example is female genital amputation. In some countries and cultures, it is
legal, but the international community is considered to infringe on women's rights
and is outlawed. This argues that universalism is cultural, economic and
political imperialism. The reason is that the concept of human rights adopted
by the great powers is based on the political liberal outlook that has not been
adopted elsewhere. Their confrontation is interesting. In absolute terms, the
argument for a relativist perspective cannot be viewed as correct, given the
differences in views based on different positions. But their argument is not
wrong. From another point of view, it is partly true that universalism is
cultural, economic and political imperialism. It is interesting that we are
living in this dilemma.
Question
I support the universalist view of human
rights. What arguments should be made to persuade people from a relativistic
point of view from a universal point of view?
I also support the universal view of human rights. This is because we believe that there is a high risk of missing the most important concept of human rights in the process of approaching human rights by recognizing metamorphosis from a relativistic perspective. Therefore, in order to persuade those with relativistic views, I think we should show a lot of examples that have undermined the important value of human rights when we put the relativist perspective on human rights.
ReplyDelete