How useful the WB pages are compared to Wikipedia description/Lim Ji Won
WB takes equality between people more important than Wikipedia. In other words, WB puts emphasis on improving the quality of life by focusing on the poor, and raising the quality of life for everyone.
On the other hand, Wikipedia describes social development in a very comprehensive concept. Social development that Wikipedia thinks includes not only economic and quality of life improvement, but also political, social and technological development.
The biggest difference is that Wikipedia is the role of an "encyclopedia" of gaining knowledge, but "WB" is a "project" that puts their thoughts into practice.
"WB" contributes to social development in a way that improves the quality of life by supporting the poor. If so, in what way do you think Wikipedia is currently contributing to social development?
On the other hand, Wikipedia describes social development in a very comprehensive concept. Social development that Wikipedia thinks includes not only economic and quality of life improvement, but also political, social and technological development.
The biggest difference is that Wikipedia is the role of an "encyclopedia" of gaining knowledge, but "WB" is a "project" that puts their thoughts into practice.
"WB" contributes to social development in a way that improves the quality of life by supporting the poor. If so, in what way do you think Wikipedia is currently contributing to social development?
Comments
Post a Comment