How useful the WB pages are compared to Wikipedia description/Lim Ji Won

WB takes equality between people more important than Wikipedia. In other words, WB puts emphasis on improving the quality of life by focusing on the poor, and raising the quality of life for everyone.

On the other hand, Wikipedia describes social development in a very comprehensive concept. Social development that Wikipedia thinks includes not only economic and quality of life improvement, but also political, social and technological development.

The biggest difference is that Wikipedia is the role of an "encyclopedia" of gaining knowledge, but "WB" is a "project" that puts their thoughts into practice.

"WB" contributes to social development in a way that improves the quality of life by supporting the poor. If so, in what way do you think Wikipedia is currently contributing to social development?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10. Human_rights / Lee Se Hyun

Summary Human rights are the basic right to live as a person. This is an absolute domain. Applicable regardless of ethnicity, gender, age, or location and guaranteed by international law. Human rights have been modified and established over a long period of time. From ancient times to the post-World War II international human rights treaties, various changes and considerations continued. Since the 1966 Human Rights Treaty, the concept of human rights has been established and human rights are guaranteed at the international level through the UN, an international organization. Also, various efforts are made to ensure human rights in the community. Human rights organizations are established in continental units such as Africa, America, Asia, and Europe, to strive for the self-reliance of the vulnerable classes and countries. Human beings have studied human rights for a long time. Thus, the theory of human rights exists, and there are various views on human rights. Interesting point ...
Read more

W1. What are the pros and cons of using Naver versus Google for research purpose? - Hanane Ben abdeslam

Naver is an online searching program based in South-Korea. In Korea people are using Naver more than Google or other searching programs.  There is a competitive battle going on between Naver and Google, therefore I listed a few pros and cons of using Naver instead of Google. First of all, Naver’s search algorithm is built around the Korean language, which helps Naver deliver more relevant results than Google on many occasions. This is because the Korean language is different from that of the English language. Therefore, it provides better results. On the other side, Naver is not as good as Google at crawling and indexing. A lot of Korean webmasters are not worried about privacy issues, since they know that Naver is not going to index certain information, So, to avoid security breaches, they simply block Google bot from crawling their sites. Second, if we take the number of indexed sites per user in Naver, it will definitely be smaller than the number of indexed sites per...
Read more

W10 Are human rights universal? /SooBin Moon

Are human rights universal?        Human rights are universally a basic right that everyone should be respected. The theory, however, is universal, but there are differences between people in actually respecting human rights. The scope of human rights respected depends on the country, region, etc. to which the person belongs. Still, countries like India do not legally exist, but are still discriminated against in substance. And some Arab countries are still discriminated against on the basis of gender. And the people of poor countries in Africa have nothing to eat, and there are areas where life is difficult to maintain, so human rights to life cannot be respected. In the past, China's population-restricted policies and others have made some people in China think they are not in the world because their existence is not legally registered, and they do not have human rights. Besides this, various people are not respected for various reasons.
Read more