W2: Reading/Lee joon hee
Nobody expected it, but Wikipedia has become one of the most amazing websites in the world today. As with many innovations, we've had no interest in Wiki, but before we knew it came back to us as a huge curiosity.
Wikipedia has offered editors a free and spontaneous opportunity for editing. This is a broader mandate than any democracy, and has encouraged many people to bring out the best meaning as a 'cooperative community' itself, not as a goal.
Wikipedia is a community that is achieved through practical collaboration. Collaboration reflects the culture and norms of each community, and this collaboration creates social benefits that many people can rely on.
Wikipedia is a unique person who is respected but also criticized. Have you ever seen an encyclopedia with errors? This is certainly strange, but we will be able to answer 'yes'. Is there a community that can dare to follow this result made by the efforts of many volunteers over a long period of time? There are certain shortcomings, but the fact that we can learn many lessons from wiki will not change.
Reading this article, I could feel that people's perception of Wikipedia is very good. I, who is writing this, seem to be improving my perception of wiki. What was most interesting was that Wikipedia was described as an 'erroneous encyclopedia.' It's two words that seem very contradictory, but it's amazing to me to see that it's actually possible.
I think the biggest source of Wikipedia's operations is probably 'cooperation that takes place online.' However, Wikipedia received little attention in the early days of its departure and only a little time later began to draw attention. Why did people have negative thoughts about online collaboration in the early days of Wikipedia?
Comments
Post a Comment