W-Extra. “Should the death penalty be abolished?” / Kim Seon Woo
W-Extra. “Should the death penalty be abolished?” / Kim Seon Woo
Summary
The right to life The right to life is the right to be respected for the value of life. In addition, Taylor and others are widely philosophers of the right to life. As often interpreted, the concept of human beings is primarily based on being alive, so the right to life becomes the basis and basis for the existence of all human rights.
The German Constitution, which is the basis of the Korean Constitution, and the Japanese Constitution respect the right to life as a universal right. In particular, the modern German Constitution states that the right to life is the basis of all human rights and indicates that it can never be violated. This means that the state respects the right to life in the Constitutional Court in South Korea as a right to be respected by everyone. In his autobiography and ideology, "My Life and Thoughts," Albert Schweitzer also insisted on the awe-inspiring thought that all life is sacred and there is no life to be sacrificed.
Interesting Point.
The right to life is the most noble value of human rights. Therefore, I believe that the “death penalty”, which deprives the right to life, is a stronger punishment than anything else and has a certain degree of criminal deterrence. However, the principle of criminal investigation and judicial proceedings is to'make sure there is no single unjust person'. If even one person had an unfortunate death, should the death penalty be abolished? But isn't the death penalty the only way to have a deterrent in a country or society where crime is the norm?
Discussion.
I want to hear the opinions of my classmates. Should the death penalty be abolished?
Summary
The right to life The right to life is the right to be respected for the value of life. In addition, Taylor and others are widely philosophers of the right to life. As often interpreted, the concept of human beings is primarily based on being alive, so the right to life becomes the basis and basis for the existence of all human rights.
The German Constitution, which is the basis of the Korean Constitution, and the Japanese Constitution respect the right to life as a universal right. In particular, the modern German Constitution states that the right to life is the basis of all human rights and indicates that it can never be violated. This means that the state respects the right to life in the Constitutional Court in South Korea as a right to be respected by everyone. In his autobiography and ideology, "My Life and Thoughts," Albert Schweitzer also insisted on the awe-inspiring thought that all life is sacred and there is no life to be sacrificed.
Interesting Point.
The right to life is the most noble value of human rights. Therefore, I believe that the “death penalty”, which deprives the right to life, is a stronger punishment than anything else and has a certain degree of criminal deterrence. However, the principle of criminal investigation and judicial proceedings is to'make sure there is no single unjust person'. If even one person had an unfortunate death, should the death penalty be abolished? But isn't the death penalty the only way to have a deterrent in a country or society where crime is the norm?
Discussion.
I want to hear the opinions of my classmates. Should the death penalty be abolished?
Comments
Post a Comment