WK 11.1 Social development is economic development
Elected officials, chambers of commerce, and various industry groups talk about the importance of economic development. Economic development is a process of targeted activities and programs that work to improve the economic wellbeing and quality of life of a community by building local wealth, diversifying the economy, creating and retaining jobs, and building the local tax base. However, the fundamental goal of economic development is not economic growth, but improvement in human welfare, what we often call human development, or social development. By any sensible measure of human development, the postwar development effort has been an astonishing success. Furthermore, the economic part of it could be thought to be relatively straightforward. Surely, a steady rise in per capita income as conventionally measures is an anchor, while necessary, is certainly not sufficient for development, and even for economic development. The distribution of this rising income among the population is legitimately in the domain of economic development. Two key features of the distribution of income are inequality and poverty. If average income rises but the inequality of its distribution also increases, then an egalitarian perspective would mark down the latter as a negative aspect of economic development. If poverty, the population below a socially acceptable level of income, also increases then this is another negative mark to be set against rising average income in assessing economic development. Of course, the actual outcome on poverty will depend on an interaction between average income and inequality and which of the two forces dominates empirically.
Clearly, economic development efforts are important to a community, and even more so in our rural resort environment due to our unique economic challenges. A proactive approach to helping business and entrepreneurs also directly helps our communities, keeping our towns and our valley as a great place to live, work, and play, now and into the future.
Do you think if higher average income is accompanied by increasingly unequal distribution, an egalitarian perspective will qualify it as negative?
Hanane Ben Abdeslam
Comments
Post a Comment