W5. Reading (2) / Kim Seon Woo
Before starting, I'm sorry to be late.
I haven't been feeling well for a while, I couldn't do my homework. Please forgive me Peter!
Now, the view of evolutionary theory is largely understood as three. After World War II, the Cold War era was the focus. The United States and the Soviet Union were proud to be the best in their respective systems. And the colonial countries that escaped the colonial rule of the European powers tried to develop. Now, the new step in social development is the development of artificial intelligence. Most of our world On April 19, 2020, the view of evolutionary theory is largely understood from three perspectives. From a political point of view, after World War II, this time the Cold War era was considered the main focus of evolution.
The United States and the Soviet Union called it the best in their respective systems. Many countries liberated from colonial rule have tried to develop themselves, and this itself has become the role model of social and cultural evolution. From a technical point of view, we present a combination of artificial intelligence and data at the next stage in society. Much of our lives will continue to rely on a variety of electronic features, and we think we have already reached the turning point of evolution that many have thought. From an anthropological perspective, external factors (competition in different societies, different natural environments) are thought to be the center of evolution, and some have to prioritize adaptation to nature and harmony with other groups, not "progress" Suggested.
I was focusing on understanding socio-cultural evolution this week, but it wasn't as easy as I thought. And it was interesting that quite a few theorists are interested in this. I think that our society should focus more on the group's environment and harmony with the environment than in the past, rather than what is generally called "civilization". "Is more important than in the past. Escape countries from the colonies have worked harder than anyone else for their own development, and scholars have regarded them as models for explaining different socio-cultural evolutions. Then Korea is also included in this category. If so, how should Korea develop from a technical or anthropological perspective?
I haven't been feeling well for a while, I couldn't do my homework. Please forgive me Peter!
Now, the view of evolutionary theory is largely understood as three. After World War II, the Cold War era was the focus. The United States and the Soviet Union were proud to be the best in their respective systems. And the colonial countries that escaped the colonial rule of the European powers tried to develop. Now, the new step in social development is the development of artificial intelligence. Most of our world On April 19, 2020, the view of evolutionary theory is largely understood from three perspectives. From a political point of view, after World War II, this time the Cold War era was considered the main focus of evolution.
The United States and the Soviet Union called it the best in their respective systems. Many countries liberated from colonial rule have tried to develop themselves, and this itself has become the role model of social and cultural evolution. From a technical point of view, we present a combination of artificial intelligence and data at the next stage in society. Much of our lives will continue to rely on a variety of electronic features, and we think we have already reached the turning point of evolution that many have thought. From an anthropological perspective, external factors (competition in different societies, different natural environments) are thought to be the center of evolution, and some have to prioritize adaptation to nature and harmony with other groups, not "progress" Suggested.
I was focusing on understanding socio-cultural evolution this week, but it wasn't as easy as I thought. And it was interesting that quite a few theorists are interested in this. I think that our society should focus more on the group's environment and harmony with the environment than in the past, rather than what is generally called "civilization". "Is more important than in the past. Escape countries from the colonies have worked harder than anyone else for their own development, and scholars have regarded them as models for explaining different socio-cultural evolutions. Then Korea is also included in this category. If so, how should Korea develop from a technical or anthropological perspective?
Comments
Post a Comment