Human Rights and Asian Values / Kim Ami
1. Summary
Human rights were exposed to
the state, with World War II and the Holocaust becoming a catalyst and
recognized in communities and family networks of families. However, Asia has
begun to raise its value by criticizing the universality of human rights movements
centered on Western countries. Asian countries pointed out that Western
countries colonized Asian countries, and it is a problem with Western
countries' human rights awareness. In other words, they argued that although
they do not deny the universality of human rights, they should reflect specific
situations in certain countries at certain times. In response, universal human
rights advocates accuse their claims of being extremely cultural relativistic
and morally unreasonable.
2. Interesting point
What's interesting is that human
rights, which used to be considered universal, clashed with Asian values. After
reading this article, I felt that the Western-centered human rights movement
that looted Asia from the perspective of Asia deserves criticism. However,
looking at Asia's claims made me wonder if I should accept unreasonable
culture, although it is natural to respect culture.
3. Discuission
Should human
rights be universal? Should it be relative?
The concept of human rights is universal. It is a right that should be guaranteed by any human being. People have rights everywhere, regardless of race, color, sex or whatever. Therefore, I did not agree with the relative interpretation of human rights and felt that human rights must be universal.
ReplyDelete