Wikipedia: Reliable sources/ Lee joon hee
Everything recorded in Wikipedia should be based on reliable sources. This works rigorously and of course writing that does not comply with this cannot be written to Wikipedia. Wikipedia includes this and there are a variety of policies, all of which are prioritized by each other and the editor must try to resolve the contradictions arising from considering them.
Wikipedia is very strict about the reliability of its sources. The source they say here is limited to 'the work itself, the creator of the work, and the publisher of the work.' What's interesting is that the source of arguing about "life" should be removed without asking for any reason, no matter how reliable it may be.
On the other hand, they also show new sides of themselves. Wikipedia emphasizes value neutrality to its editors. However, it is not from the source. It is said that accepting sources from various perspectives does not limit the use of somewhat biased sources because they can create more colorful stories.
We collect a lot of data from various places while doing our task. And when data is to be cited, the source of the data is extremely important because it shows the reliability of the data. In this regard, Wikipedia, which has a certain guideline for reliable data, may be more reliable than I imagined. But in Korea, I think the reliability of the data found on Wikipedia is lower than I thought. Wouldn't we be able to trust and use Wikipedia's knowledge?
Comments
Post a Comment