Wikipedia : Reliable sources

정보사회학과 2016014457 전영수
depart of infosocio, 2016014457, Jeon yeongsu



Reliable sources can get from popular publisher, the article wright by prestigious specialist, study of sufficient academic review, reliable media and so on. generally, 'authoritative' sources get trust to be reliable. On the other side, personal writing and study of non sufficient checking can't be reliable.
 
In wikipedia's article, I'm surprised because older study and books get lose credibility. I thought older studies generally are considered to 'authoritative'. But I can know that most of field, for example science, medicine, politics, fashon etc, prefer new information and theory because it is more suitable to today's society.
 
a lot of the sources, can find from already established literature. I wonder what's sources do we have to use for studying new field or analysis public opinion that can get by personal writing be considered not reliable.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

W4. Millennium Development Goals / Lee Se Hyun

What is meant by that? / Lee hayoung

W10. Human_rights / Lee Se Hyun