Week 1-2 // Wikipedia's Reliable sources

Wikipedia's Reliable sources


1) summarize
Wikipedia is something that countless people make together. It is not the work of one man, but of all men.  It can be produced and modified together, and it can contain a lot of material. However, it inevitably causes damage from reckless, unreliable, and inaccurate data. So, if people want to make something, it takes some hard conditions. Typically, the source of the data stands for three conditions. First, The piece of work itself? Second, The creator of the work? Third, The publisher of the work? These conditions should be met and so it is accepted as reliable sources.

2) learn
At first, I had only thought that Wikipedia's content was an inaccurate, unreliable, and unclear collection of data. But more than I thought, Wikipedia is very much concerned about the systematic and essential data selecting that fit the vast data.  I thought it would be better to use Wikipedia's systematic data in a more appropriate way than to use and quote unknown materials such as general blogs and homepages.

3) question
But anyway, Wikipedia is a material that groups from the experts to the amateurs. The question is that how to produce objective and reliable data in an environment of so many different races and knowledge.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

W4. Millennium Development Goals / Lee Se Hyun

What is meant by that? / Lee hayoung

W10. Human_rights / Lee Se Hyun