Week 1-2 // Wikipedia's Reliable sources
Wikipedia's Reliable sources
1) summarize
Wikipedia is something that countless
people make together. It is not the work of one man, but of all men. It can be produced and modified together, and
it can contain a lot of material. However, it inevitably causes damage from
reckless, unreliable, and inaccurate data. So, if people want to make something,
it takes some hard conditions. Typically,
the source of the data stands for three conditions. First, The piece of work itself? Second, The
creator of the work? Third, The publisher of the work? These conditions should
be met and so it is accepted as reliable sources.
2) learn
At first, I had only thought that
Wikipedia's content was an inaccurate, unreliable, and unclear collection of
data. But more than I thought, Wikipedia is very much concerned about the
systematic and essential data selecting that fit the vast data. I thought it would be better to use
Wikipedia's systematic data in a more appropriate way than to use and quote
unknown materials such as general blogs and homepages.
3) question
But anyway, Wikipedia is a material that
groups from the experts to the amateurs. The question is that how to produce
objective and reliable data in an environment of so many different races and
knowledge.
Comments
Post a Comment