W2-Reading/SooBin Moon
Summary)
All the articles describe the value of Wikipedia. First, Wikipedia is meaningful as a "cooperative community." Wikipedia is a community formed through collaboration. Several people are sharing knowledge, cooperating, and creating social benefits. Second, Wikipedia is a web-based online open content book. Third, it is rewarding to understand and describe the spirit of Wikipedia collaboration. Wikipedia makes it possible for many to write interdependent and to accumulate work. Fourth, Wikipedia incompletely combines descriptions with each other to explain how neutral views and good intentions complement each other in co-production.
What's interesting, what's new?)
I was impressed that Wikipedia's neutrality should be understood not by explaining encyclopedias but by the universal perspective of contributors, their aspirations and willful positions. It was surprising that many were not trying to merge into one theory, but rather put meaning to the complexity of the online community. Wikipedia is a dictionary that utilizes advanced technology so that people with different languages can share and record knowledge together. That is why it is important to see people's various ideas and to make use of the benefits of seeing what the universal view is.
The part I want to discuss with others)
These articles illustrate the value of Wikipedia. So, what do you think Wikipedia is worth? (You may reiterate the value mentioned in the referenced article or talk about your experience).
Comments
Post a Comment